Blog

I’m currently debating how to charge people for Jabbify. It boils down to a simple question:

Is it better to charge a user for exactly what they’ve used; or is it better to segment users into price brackets?

The following list the pros and cons of each:

Pay for what you use:

Pros

• Users should know that they will get the best deal. As pricing is flexible, their price will always match their needs.

Cons

• Jabbify account holders will be at the whim of their users. Their price might change drastically depending if they have a month where their page views skyrocket.

Brackets

Pros

• As long as their needs don’t change, they will always get charged the same amount. They can be certain there are no surprises.

Cons

• Users have to make a choice and guess at their needs. We can assuage this by providing a free month where statistics can guide them into selecting the right bracket.

Conclusion

My gut tells me that pay for what you use might sound better, and get more people to signup. Users don’t have to make a choice about their needs. However, I see people getting very frightened when they put in their credit card. Of course, they will have the option to cancel the service before we charge them. But, I still see it as scary and not common among other Software as a Service companies.

Got an opinion?  Please share!

His article:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27992

My response:
If you want to get an objective understanding of how politicians have voted on the issues, I suggest ontheissues.org.  Here’s the link for their compiled data on Obama: http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Barack_Obama_Abortion.htm.

If you read it, you will find that he is indeed a large abortion supporter.  However, he does think that a state can restrict late-term partial birth abortions provided that the mother’s health is taken into account and the legislation doesn’t create a slippery slope leading to a ban on all abortions.  This is made clear in the first quote of that link.

He’s even pissed off NOW voting ‘present’ on anti-abortion bills instead of ‘no’.

I’ve actually read the Born Alive Infants Protection Act a few months ago (http://www.nrlc.org/Federal/Born_Alive_Infants/Baipatext.pdf).  I hope you do too.  I can understand where Obama is coming from.  The law redefines human in such a way that it is possible to bar abortions.  Here is what Obama said.

Buchanan covers this with a non sequitur.

Obama doesn’t think a unborn baby is constitutionally human.  Therefore it isn’t murder.  This is why he supports abortion.  The answer to his question is clear.  But Buchanan uses this rhetorical question and a ‘tiny’ baby to make it seem like Obama is out of his mind.  He isn’t.  He’s just very consistent with his beliefs.

Obviously, if abortion is your issue, then Obama is not your guy.  But to use images of a baby’s skull stabbed with scissors and say Obama supports it … is dishonest and exploiting the very beings that Buchanan is seeking to support.

Nothing is as simple as it seems (unless of course there is an inerrant and unalterable book).

I hate chain mails, so very much. I hate them so much that, when receiving them from even my girlfriend’s friends, I will risk becoming a social pariah by replying with an article from Snopes and:

p.s. I HATE CHAIN MAIL

I hate chain letters for several reasons:

• They are never real or helpful
• They waste my time
• They transmit malware/viruses
• Prey off peoples’ “Faith”

Often, I feel like replying to every person in the chain with the same Snopes reply; however, I only share my outrage with the people who care enough about me to send an email in the first place. You know, the people who deserve it.

But, I was thinking about creating a service where you can forward an email and it will reply to everyone in the forward chain.

This would let Ashley Duhamel at NetJets know the Dalai Lama did not create a powerpoint slide that, through 14 different people, found its way to me.

P.S. I HATE CHAIN (e)MAIL

Notes for getting Postfix working with ActionMailer:

- Make sure there is a main.cf file (touch /etc/postfix/main.cf)
- Start the service: /etc/init.d/postfix start
- Test the service: mail brian@mydomain.com
- Configure ActionMailer

ActionMailer::Base.delivery_method = :sendmail

Have you ever been frustrated trying to start a server in Windows and you get a “Bad file descriptor” error? That means most likely there is another process running that is listening at port the port you’re trying to listen on. In Linux operating systems, the solution is to use lsof.

lsof -i:80

Tells you exactly the process ID that you are competing with for port 80.

kill -9 3212

kills it and frees the port. In Windows, run:

netstat -aon

To see a listing of all listening ports and the processes that own them, along with the process id. Open Task manager, go to View > Select Columns, and add process ID. Now you can find the problem process and kill it.

By the way, if the name is something like inetd and you’re fighting for access to port 80, chances are its the IIS Admin service, and you actually have to open Windows Services and stop it, or it will continue restarting itself.

I part of the John Stewart generation.  Despite originally hating him as Criag Kilborn’s replacement, I’ve grown to admire his political attitude which was best summarized in his crossfire debate.

In summary, politics, the media, and the American people are suffering from self-imposed division.  It keeps this country from moving forward.
This is why Obama has been so refreshing.  He seems to actually want to unite people.  And, despite changing his position on public financing, I think he really means it.

Today, you might have noticed the seemingly heated exchange between Dobson and Obama.
In my opinion, it highlights Obama’s challenges with being a uniter.

Challenges
It’s very clear that Dobson is projecting his views on the senator onto what Obama said.  Obama has a very liberal voting record, especially on abortion.  But Obama was not taking a stance on abortion, gay rights, or guns.  He wasn’t saying faith should be removed from someone’s decision making process.   Obama was giving the faithful a blueprint for success in the ‘enlightened’ 21st century.

Secular arguments

A ’secular’ position is only secular because it has the strongest rational arguments. If religious people can make secular arguments, like they eventually did with slavery, and equal rights (MLK), they have a much stronger chance at public policy.

Resorting to “God told us so” is not going to play out in public policy.  Obama is giving instructions on how religious leaders can find common ground.  Maybe if Dobson listened to him, he would be more effective at his pro-choice efforts.

Unfair comparison

Dobson distorts Obama’s words in the way he is accuses Obama of distorting the bible.  Obama didn’t compare Dobson with Sharpton.  In fact he used their differences to provide more evidence for his point - that people interpret their religion very differently.

Great experiement

Obama’s campaign is a great experiment on the American people.  I disagree with most of his economic stances.  But I can’t get over the fact that he is always well reasoned in his public discourse.  I’m hoping that there are other Americans who can recognize the importance of voting for the a man that represents something, other than the opinions that will get him elected.

Today, Tim Russert died. He was, by far, my favorite political journalist. He established himself with the difficult combination of opinion and fairness, which can only be archived through the perfect, but contradictory balance of confidence and humility.

It was only fitting that he demonstrated his paradoxical nature in one of his last public acts - pronouncing the Democratic Primary for Obama. A bold, but correct move.  I’m going to miss him.

It has been a long time since we’ve posted. The reason? We’ve been very busy with JavaScriptMVC and its blog.

Here’s a list of things that have been going on with JavaScriptMVC, Jupiter, and myself (Brian will update you separately if he finds the time) .

JavaScriptMVC

• Released first beta, but haven’t publicized it yet.
• Got a rhino based compressor working. I haven’t spent time with Java since my college work. What I would have done to have Eclipse then.
• Just created a pretty good plan for JavaScriptMVC 2.0.
• We’ve been getting about 50 downloads a day for the last month or so.

Jupiter

• Still trying to close a deal that’s lasted over 7 months, but it actually is starting to get some headwind.
• We are going to create a professional version of F->IT. It’s very old 0.1 release has gotten over 3000 downloads without any promotion. The online version will start having ads on the homepage. We have to pay the bills.
• We are going to do the same thing with DamnIT and potentially CommentIT. Unless someone protests, NoteIT will probably see no future development.
• We put ads on JavaScriptMVC’s site. But we aren’t making any money. I think our add location is very bad.
• We’re going to moved F->IT to Amazon’s Elastic Compute Cloud. Someday Brian will give a tutorial on how to setup a rails app on it. It’s a pretty good deal.
• We’re moving to Rails 2.0 for all of our applications.
• A lot of deals have gone south. Lost one job to a Chinese competitor. I didn’t think that sort of thing actually happened … wrong.

Justin

• Went to Jamaica on my first real vacation since I left Accenture.
• Joined Aspiring Association of Business Leaders.
• Joined Thin Server Architecture Group.

Install the plugin

ruby script/plugin install exception_notification

Set up the plugin
Include the following inside the ApplicationController:

include ExceptionNotifiable

Set up ActionMailer by including the following in environment.rb:

ActionMailer::Base.smtp_settings = {
:address  => “secureserver.net”,
:port  => 80,
:domain  => ‘www.sever.com’,
:user_name  => “accounts@server.com”,
:password  => ‘pass’,
:authentication  => :login
}

Set up ExceptionNotification by including the following in environment.rb:

ExceptionNotifier.exception_recipients = %w(brian@server.com)
ExceptionNotifier.sender_address = %w(brian@server.com)

Testing it

This is the part I always forget.  ExceptionNotifier by default does not work in development mode or when the web server is accessed from localhost.

1. Turn on production mode.
2. Add “local_addresses.clear” to ApplicationController.

Rails 2.0 uses cookie-based sessions by default.  This eliminates one place where passwords are stored on the server: session files.  Passwords are also being stored in your log file because Rails logs every parameter of every request.  To hide passwords, add the following in application.rb:

class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
filter_parameter_logging :password